Welcome to EDELWEISS 2026

In a country bending toward authoritarian control, the EDELWEISS flower stands as a defiant symbol rooted in RESISTANCE, it opposes fascism, religious extremism and the ugliness of racism + bigotry + misogyny.We have ONE YEAR UNTIL MIDTERMS which may be our last chance to affect the horrific direction our country is heading.

#VOTETHEMOUT

Edelweiss2026

We are here to inform, unite, and motivate US citizens to peacefully resist authoritarian rule, restore hope, and uphold our democracy.

#VOTETHEMOUT

The Origin of Edelweiss

The Edelweiss Pirates stood as a spark of rebellion in Hitler’s Germany, young people who refused to bow to fear, choosing freedom, defiance, and humanity over blind obedience.

Are We Great Yet?

We were all lied to and promised things that at least half of us knew was complete bullshit. The combination of Trump's revenge tour, the Heritage Foundation's Nazi playbook, Christian Nationalist hate, and Male Conservative fragility - has resulted in absolutely nothing that benefits regular US citizen:

  • All dissent being silenced.

  • Everything is more expensive.

  • “Christian values” = racism.

  • "Family values" = misogyny.

  • Women’s rights are disappearing.

  • Jobs are becoming scarce.

  • Supreme Court is compromised.

  • Media is being manipulated.

  • All our data is being tracked.

  • Elites keep gaining more power.

  • U.S. is a global embarrassment.

#VOTETHEMOUT

Time Until Midterms

    #VOTETHEMOUT

    How We Got Here

    The corrupt elites are orchestrating a totalitarian takeover led by the best con man of our era. The chaos feels complicated, but it’s all by design.

    Let's break down the 8 factors that contributed to this mess.

    1 - Heritage Foundation
    The Heritage Foundation is a wealthy, far-right machine hell-bent on dragging America backward. They bankrolled their way into power to force Project 2025 an extremist blueprint to gut rights, stack agencies with loyalists, and crush public education and the environment. Their endgame? A corporate-run theocracy soaked in Christian nationalism, racism, and misogyny. Greed and religious extremism are their weapons of choice.
    Learn More
    2. SHitler Wannabe
    The Orange Felon idolizes Mein Kampf and craves the power Hitler had (racial hierarchy, anti-Semitism, and unchecked control). Like Hitler, he rejects democracy, exploits propaganda, fuels rage, and targets the vulnerable. Both rose by promising to “save” their country while dismantling it from within. Sound familiar?
    Learn More
    3. Shitty People - Being Shitty
    Cruelty defines their ideology "if it doesn't affect me, then I don't care". Radicalized by partisan media and echo chambers, they’ve been taught to fear immigrants, liberals, and institutions. That fear evolved into cultlike devotion to a leader who validates their bigotry and exploits their insecurities. Facts don’t matter; loyalty trumps truth. And remember, Trump and the Heritage Foundation don’t care about you. Never have and never will. You’re just a pawn.
    Learn More
    4. Corrupt Supreme Court
    Many now view the Supreme Court especially its right-wing majority as compromised. Instead of acting as neutral interpreters of the law, they seem to push partisan agendas, backed by reports of secret gifts and ties to wealthy donors. The perception is growing that the Court works for, not against, executive power.
    Learn More
    5. Spineless GOP
    The GOP-controlled Congress is seen by many as useless at best, dangerous at worst. They block oversight, bury investigations, and push laws that serve donors, not citizens. They act as the president’s enablers and push his agenda, shielding his corruption, and gutting support for everyday Americans. To most, they’re not representative, they're a partisan firewall.
    Spinless GOP (Coming Soon)
    6. Religious Psychosis
    “Religious psychosis” describes how extreme far-right religious beliefs can drive delusional, irrational behavior. It treats political actions as divinely ordained, casts opponents as evil, and rejects facts for apocalyptic narratives justifying authoritarian control, demonizing marginalized groups, and detaching from reality under the guise of faith.
    Learn More
    7. Control The Narrative
    Through Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation, the administration has built a coordinated propaganda machine that controls the public narrative like a marketing campaign. Every message is synchronized across media outlets to reinforce a single storyline, while dissenting voices face censorship, suppression, or legal intimidation. The result is an echo chamber where repetition replaces truth, and control, not honesty is the ultimate goal.
    The Manosphere Echo-Chamber (Coming Soon)
    8. Lie - Deny - Distract
    The current president relies heavily on a strategy of repeated lies told during the campaign and throughout his term that he continues to deny even when proven false. Rather than correct the record, he doubles down, discredits critics, and reshapes reality to fit his narrative. To keep public attention diverted, he stages dramatic events or makes provocative statements, distracting from scandals or failures. His goal isn’t truth, it’s control: to confuse, dominate the narrative, and condition the public to accept his version of reality over facts.
    The Lies and Hypocrisy

    We Will Be OK

    Cruelty and control may rule this moment, but not forever. There is a world where we treat each other with kindness, ensure equality and respect for everyone, send racists back to their basements, keep religion where it belongs (only in the church) and lock away the pedophiles.We will stand together, focus on the world we want, and breathe again.

    So What Can Be Done?

    It takes determination and courage to not just lay down and accept this. We have to GET INFORMED, GET LOUD, and GET ACTIVE!

    #VOTETHEMOUT

    Get Informed

    The strongest resistance isn’t violent, it’s informed, organized, and unified. When we show up and speak out together, their power fades. These insecure monsters fear pushback and crumble under pressure. The fight begins with your mind, get informed and stay relentless.

    The Fear
    If they lose control of the House and Senate in 2026, accountability will finally come — through lawful indictments, investigations, and a reckoning driven both by justice and by the will of the people. That is why efforts to manipulate the system have already begun: undermining trust in voting, consolidating control over election infrastructure, fueling division, and redrawing districts to preserve power.
    VOTE THEM OUT (Coming Soon)
    The Lies
    This administration floods the public with constant lies, twisting reality and numbing people into submission. The repetition has bred cultlike loyalty, blinding followers to truth and hardening them against facts. Evidence no longer matters only the leader’s word does. It’s not mere deception anymore; it’s mass conditioning that erodes reason itself. Stay focused on the facts and be relentless on demanding examples and proof. Hint: They never have any.
    Trump The Liar
    The Hypocrisy
    The hypocrisy of today’s conservatives is staggering. They accuse others of corruption while enriching their own circles, denounce “cancel culture” while silencing dissent, and decry violence as their extremists spread it. Every accusation is projection, mirroring their own actions to keep followers blind to the truth. "It's only wrong when it affects me" should be printed on the conservatives tshirts.
    Learn More
    The Coverups
    They think we don’t see it — the backroom deals, the quiet coverups, the distractions rolled out the moment someone gets too close to exposing them. Every time the truth starts to break through, they flood the airwaves with noise. But the truth has a way of surviving the spin, and people are finally waking up to the deceit.
    What They Are Hiding (Coming Soon)
    The Extortion
    We’re continually witnessing a pressure campaign from the current regime where critics speak out confidently, then quickly reverse their words as if nothing happened. It suggests coercion at work, forcing dissenters to recant not by choice, but through intimidation or threat.
    Some Examples - (Coming Soon)

    Get Loud

    Silence is no longer an option. The lost souls won’t change because they don’t care. Trump has helped the racists and bigots feel accepted and loved. That is NOT ok.Speak up and focus your energy on those still capable of critical thought and hope.

    Push Back Guide
    (Coming Soon)

    Call Them On Their Shit
    Enough is enough. Stop making excuses for voting for a con man. Stop pretending “it was about border security” or "law and order" when we all know it’s about racism, misogyny, and control. Stop letting politicians lie through their teeth without calling them on it. And stop letting the so-called “good people” act like they didn’t help create this chaos. If you stood by, stayed quiet, or cheered it on—you’re part of it. No more politeness. No more pretending. It’s time to call people out on their bullshit, loud and clear.
    Shut Them Down
    You can’t win a shouting match with someone who rejects reality. Don’t match their anger—end it with, “I’m not debating truth with someone who chooses lies,” and walk away. They feed on attention, so don’t give it. Save your energy for people willing to think and change—and don’t hesitate to call out hypocrisy when you see it.

    Get Active

    It’s time to stop sitting out. Feeling helpless only serves their agenda. Real change comes from people who refuse to accept corruption.Speak up, push back, get involved and most importantly VOTE THEM OUT!!! Don’t wait for the system to fix itself, get active and make it happen.

    #VOTETHEMOUT

    Resistance Guide
    (Coming Soon)

    VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE
    Use your vote to support leaders who defend democracy and demand accountability and Vote out the garbage that is in office today.
    Community Organizations
    Build local networks that protect rights and turn small movements into real change through peaceful protests, community outreach and being united for the cause.
    Legal Pressure
    Back efforts that expose corruption and fight for justice under the law. The most effective way to stop the elites and "untouchables" is to see them humbled in court.
    Economic Pressure
    Use your spending power to reject corruption and show the ultra wealthy that their controls over the rest of society are fragile and can be disrupted.
    Direct Support
    Lead with compassion through volunteering and donating time and energy to protecting those who might be in the same situation or possibly less fortunate.

    Get Connected

    Connection is resistance. Authoritarian power feeds on isolation. Start where you are, connect with others who share your vision and values online, in your community, or at home. Every connection strengthens truth and weakens oppression.

    Social Media
    Increase volume, frequency, and intensity of social media to share verified facts, challenge misinformation, and amplify messages that inform rather than divide. Truth weakens the authoritarian narrative and strengthens the resistance.

    #VOTETHEMOUT

    © 2025 Edelweiss2026 Inc. All rights reserved. Hosted by Your Mom's Website Hosting Services.

    Edelweiss Then and Now

    Context
    In Nazi Germany, the regime forced youth into organizations like the Hitler Youth and the League of German Girls to promote obedience and militarism. By 1936, participation became mandatory, and refusing meant punishment. Many working-class teens, tired of strict rules and propaganda, quietly rebelled. From this discontent, small groups began forming their own circles, ones that valued freedom, music, and individuality.    Emergence
    The Edelweiss Pirates were loose networks of young resisters, mostly in western Germany, cities like Cologne, Düsseldorf, and Essen. They were typically 14 to 17 years old, too young for the army but old enough to resist the Hitler Youth system. They adopted the edelweiss flower as a symbol of purity and defiance, and the term “Pirates,” once used as an insult, became their proud badge of rebellion.    Beliefs & Values
    The Pirates rejected Nazi conformity and control. They believed in freedom, fairness, equality, and the right to live without fear. They loved outdoor life, hiking, and singing songs banned by the regime. They embraced co-ed friendship, jazz and swing music, and individuality, everything the Nazis despised. Their rebellion was as much cultural as political, standing for kindness, peace, and human decency in a cruel time.    Tactics & Approach
    The Edelweiss Pirates resisted in many ways: distributing anti-Nazi leaflets, sheltering army deserters and escaped prisoners, sabotaging Nazi vehicles, painting graffiti like “Down with Hitler,” and mocking Hitler Youth patrols. They met secretly, used nicknames, and stayed decentralized to avoid detection. Their actions were small but brave, moral resistance expressed through culture, defiance, and acts of solidarity.    Impact & Consequences
    Though they couldn’t change the war’s outcome, their defiance mattered deeply. They showed that not all Germans accepted fascism. Their local acts, spreading truth, protecting the persecuted, and sabotaging Nazi operations — offered hope in dark times. The Gestapo saw them as dangerous; many were imprisoned, tortured, or executed, including 16-year-old Barthel Schink, hanged in Cologne in 1944 for helping fugitives.    Legacy
    After the war, the Edelweiss Pirates were long overlooked because they weren’t part of formal resistance groups. But over time, Germany began to honor them as symbols of youthful courage. Streets and memorials now bear their names, and some have been recognized for saving lives. They remain a reminder that even in the most oppressive times, ordinary young people can stand up for freedom, peace, and humanity.

    Project 2025 - Satan's Playbook

    Project 2025 is a sweeping policy “playbook” launched by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation (with help from numerous allied organizations and former Trump administration figures) as a blueprint for how a future conservative or right-wing presidency might reorganize, consolidate, and reshape the federal government.The core idea is to have a ready-made set of policies, executive orders, personnel plans, and structural reforms that could be deployed early in a new administration to quickly remake the federal government in alignment with conservative priorities. There are 4 main pillars to this diabolical plan.

    Four Pillars To This Diabolical Plan

    • A policy guide (“Mandate for Leadership” ~900 pages) laying out desired legislation, executive orders, and structural reforms.

    • A personnel database or “talent bank” of vetted conservative candidates for federal positions, intended to supply loyalists to fill roles quickly.

    • Training and “administration academy” programs for future appointees and bureaucrats in conservative governance.

    • A 180-day “playbook” for rapid early executive actions across federal agencies.

    Context

    Project 2025 emerged in roughly 2022–2023. Many of its authors are figureheads or former officials from the Trump administration and conservative movement circles. While the project claimed to not be tied to any candidate (which we all know Trump lied to all of us), it has become the script to fascism that Trump is following. Critics and analysts view it as a concerted push toward executive consolidation of power and a roadmap for democratic backsliding. The core idea is to have a ready-made set of policies, executive orders, personnel plans, and structural reforms that could be deployed early in a new administration to quickly remake the federal government in alignment with conservative priorities.

    Key Points and Impacts
    1. Expansion of Presidential Power – Centralizes control of all federal agencies under the president, weakening checks and balances and risking authoritarian use of power.
    2. Dismantling the Administrative State – Shrinks or eliminates agencies like the EPA, Department of Education, and labor regulators, reducing environmental, workplace, and consumer protections.
    3. Education and “Parental Rights” Agenda – Defunds or eliminates federal education programs and promotes private and religious schools, deepening inequality and limiting access to public education.
    4. Reproductive and LGBTQ+ Restrictions – Seeks nationwide limits on abortion, contraception, and gender rights, removing autonomy and civil protections for women and LGBTQ+ citizens.
    5. Economic and Social Safety Net Overhaul – Cuts taxes for corporations and the wealthy while reducing programs like Social Security, Medicare, and food assistance, increasing economic inequality.
    6. Labor and Workforce Policy Changes – Weakens unions, reduces overtime and worker protections, giving more leverage to employers and lowering worker bargaining power.
    7. Law Enforcement and Civil Liberties – Expands policing, immigration crackdowns, and surveillance powers, risking overreach, censorship, and targeting of marginalized groups.
    8. Federal Workforce “Loyalty” Restructuring – Replaces nonpartisan civil servants with political loyalists, reducing competence, accountability, and impartial public service.
    9. Cultural and Religious Re-Engineering – Promotes a Christian-nationalist vision of government, pushing religion into policy and marginalizing secular or diverse perspectives.
    10. Environmental and Climate Rollbacks – Rolls back clean air, water, and climate regulations, benefiting industry at the expense of public health and environmental safety.
    11. Judicial and Legal Realignment – Aims to install ideologically aligned judges and weaken judicial independence, threatening impartial justice and minority protections.
    12. Federalism Shift to States – Pushes responsibilities like healthcare, education, and regulation to states, creating unequal rights and services depending on where citizens live.

    Pay Attention - Project 2025 Impact Today

    • Civil service “politicization” & workforce cuts - Advancing - The administration is making it easier to fire non-political government workers and replace them with loyalists. They call it “reforming” the civil service, but it means many experienced people who keep government programs running are being pushed out. This weakens departments like Health, Education, and Housing, slowing services people rely on — such as food aid, healthcare programs, and housing support.

    • Regulation, climate & energy - Advancing fast, heavy litigation - Environmental protections are being rolled back fast. The EPA has been told to loosen pollution rules and revisit key climate safeguards. That means more pollution in the air and water, less accountability for big energy companies, and higher health risks for communities. Lawsuits are underway, but in the meantime, ordinary people are left with dirtier air and more uncertainty about clean energy jobs and costs.

    • Education, civil rights & Title IX - Advancing, partly blocked - Rules protecting LGBTQ+ students and employees are being reversed, and diversity and inclusion programs in schools and workplaces are being shut down. The result is confusion and fear on campuses and at companies that once had strong anti-discrimination policies. Many schools are now unsure what rights apply, and some groups are losing protections they once had.

    • Immigration & asylum - Advancing, high conflict - The government has taken a harsh approach to immigration — calling the border an “invasion,” increasing arrests, and restricting asylum rights. Cities and states are fighting back in court, saying these policies are cruel and unworkable. Families are being separated, people seeking safety are turned away, and communities are being left to manage the fallout.

    • Health & social programs — Mixed; states backfilling - Federal cuts to health, food, and public services are forcing states to step in temporarily — but many can’t afford it long-term. That means families could lose healthcare coverage, food benefits, and access to public broadcasting or local services. It’s creating more stress for working families and seniors, especially in poorer states.

    MAGA or Just Shitty People

    Trump’s most ardent followers, often self-identified as “MAGA” loyalists exhibit a form of allegiance that borders on the cultic. Their loyalty is less transactional than emotional: they defend him reflexively, excuse his excesses, and reject evidence that contradicts their worldview. They view dissent not as legitimate criticism, but as betrayal, and they rally around him as a symbolic bulwark against a perceived elite conspiracy. This loyalty is sustained by social reinforcement, identity fusion, echo chambers, and a worldview that frames him as the only one willing to speak “truth to power.” In their eyes, his flaws are virtues (or at least necessary compromises), and questioning or abandoning him is tantamount to rejecting one’s own moral compass.

    Trump Follower (MAGA) Traits

    • Low empathy / callousness - Studies have found higher scores among Trump supporters on measures of callousness, lower affective empathy, and manipulativeness.

    • Authoritarian / obedience orientation - A tendency to defer to strong authority, demand conformity, and accept hierarchical dominance.

    • Social dominance / in-group preference - Favoring intergroup hierarchies, believing some groups deserve higher status, and viewing out-groups (immigrants, minorities, etc.) as threatening.

    • Rigidity / intolerance of ambiguity - Difficulty tolerating nuance, complexity, or contradictory information; strong “black and white” thinking.

    • Cognitive consistency / denial of dissonance - When confronted with facts or criticism, doubling down becomes the default. Contradictory data are rationalized away or dismissed as lies.

    • Overconfidence / illusion of knowledge - They often act as though they know more than they really do, confident in their judgments, even when lacking expertise. (This is where Dunning-Kruger enters.)

    • Identity fusion / us-vs-them tribalism - Their political identity is fused with personal identity; rejecting the in-group feels existential.

    • Mythic thinking / leader deification - They often see Trump not just as a politician but as a symbolic, quasi-mythical figure, someone beyond ordinary constraints.

    • Conscientious persistence / single-mindedness - Loyalists score high on the self-discipline subcomponent of conscientiousness, enabling sustained effort even in the face of pushback.

    • Selective exposure / echo-chamber behavior - Reliance on ideologically filtered media, conspiracy sources, or sympathetic echo chambers that affirm beliefs and exclude counter-views.

    • Other Notable Traits - Intellectual laziness, emotional reasoning over evidence, resentment or grievance orientation, or fear/aversion to change.

    Dunning-Kruger effect - a.k.a. Trump and MAGA

    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias where people with limited knowledge or ability overestimate their competence, essentially, they don’t know what they don’t know.Because they lack the skills needed to judge their own performance, they’re also unable to recognize their mistakes. Among Trump loyalists, this effect shows up as unwavering confidence in their political “knowledge” from interpreting polls to understanding constitutional law even when their claims contradict basic facts.Trump encourages followers to trust gut feelings and partisan soundbites over credible evidence. Many rely on social media or commentary echo chambers rather than expert sources, which reinforces their misplaced confidence and isolates them from correction.The Dunning–Kruger model may explains how people can hold extreme certainty in their beliefs despite clear contradictions: they truly believe they “see through” elite deception, yet often lack the foundational knowledge to evaluate nuance or challenge misinformation.Know anyone like this?

    SCOTUS or Right Wing Puppets

    Watchdog investigations and major outlets have documented years of undisclosed luxury travel, gifts, and preferential financial dealings involving conservative justices—paired with refusals to recuse in related matters and a Court-written ethics code with no real enforcement. At the same time, blockbuster rulings (and a growing use of the opaque “emergency” or “shadow” docket) have aggressively reshaped law in ways that align with conservative policy goals or expand presidential power, fueling perceptions of partisanship rather than neutral judging. The Court did adopt its first Code of Conduct in Nov. 2023, but it created no independent enforcement mechanism, which critics argue leaves problems unaddressed.

    Recent Examples 
    Undisclosed luxury travel & gifts to Justice ThomasProPublica reported decades of private jet and super-yacht trips and other largesse from billionaire Harlan Crow that weren’t properly disclosed; Thomas later acknowledged he should have disclosed more.
    Crow paying private-school tuition for Thomas’s wardReporting showed Crow covered tuition for a relative Thomas said he was raising “as a son,” raising conflict-of-interest concerns.
    Forgiven loan for Thomas’s luxury RVA Senate Finance Committee inquiry (following earlier New York Times reporting) said a businessman forgave much of a $267,000 loan Thomas used to buy a motor coach; the forgiveness was not reported on ethics filings.
    Justice Alito’s undisclosed private-jet trip with hedge-fund billionaireProPublica revealed Alito flew on Paul Singer’s jet to a luxury fishing trip and did not disclose the gift; Singer’s fund later had business before the Court. Alito disputed wrongdoing; ethics experts said disclosure was required.
    Alito’s political-coded flags & refusal to recuse in Jan. 6/Trump casesNews outlets documented an upside-down U.S. flag and an “Appeal to Heaven” flag flown at Alito’s homes—symbols embraced by some Jan. 6 participants—followed by his refusal to step aside from related cases.
    Justice Gorsuch’s land sale to a BigLaw CEO with cases at the CourtWithin days of his confirmation, Gorsuch sold property to Greenberg Traurig’s CEO; disclosure forms didn’t name the buyer, prompting conflict-of-interest questions.
    A Code of Conduct with no enforcementThe Court adopted an ethics code in Nov. 2023, but it’s self-policed and lacks independent enforcement—one reason confidence hasn’t recovered.
    Trump v. United States (2024): broad criminal immunity for “official acts”The Court’s 6–3 ruling granted a former president absolute immunity for core constitutional acts and presumptive immunity for other official acts—denounced by many as placing presidents above the law.
    Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024): ending Chevron deferenceBy overturning a 40-year precedent that let expert agencies interpret ambiguous statutes, the Court shifted power from agencies to judges—seen by critics as an ideological project to weaken regulation.
    Heavy, pro-executive use of the “shadow docket” (2025)Analyses show the Court has increasingly granted emergency requests aiding the current administration, often with scant reasoning—fueling claims of results-oriented, nontransparent decision-making.

    And the WORST Example: Reversal of Roe v. Wade — Dobbs v. Jackson (2022)

    • On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, by a 6–3 vote, held that the U.S. Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. It overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).

    • The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, reasoned that because the Constitution does not explicitly mention abortion and abortion rights were not “deeply rooted” in U.S. history or tradition, the question of abortion policy should revert to the states (i.e. be decided by state legislatures) rather than be protected federally.

    • Chief Justice Roberts did not join the majority’s opinion overturning Roe, but concurred in the judgment to uphold Mississippi’s abortion law. He wrote separately that he believed Roe and Casey should not be overturned entirely, even while voting to uphold the state law.

    • Before the decision was officially released, a draft majority opinion (attributed to Alito) was leaked in May 2022. The leak itself was extraordinary for the Court and heightened public perception of internal division, secrecy, and political maneuvering.

    Trust The Supreme Court?

    Potential ripple effects on other rightsIn its decision and separate concurrences, the Court signaled openness to revisiting other constitutional rights previously tied to privacy or substantive due process—such as contraception, same-sex intimacy or marriage, and other rights recognized in Griswold, Lawrence, Obergefell. Critics interpret this as the Court positioning itself to unwind a broader set of civil rights under a political agenda. (Justice Thomas’s concurring opinion explicitly called for reconsideration of precedents like Lawrence and Obergefell.)
    Legitimacy blow and public trust erosionThe decision dramatically worsened public perceptions of the Court. Many see the Court as having stepped outside a neutral, rule-based legal role and into raw political policymaking. Some legal scholars argue that when a court overturns settled rights in one term, its moral and institutional authority is weakened for future cases.
    Uneven recusal / conflicts concernsSome critics question whether justices with clear ideological or political stakes in the abortion issue should have recused themselves—but none did. The appearance of conflicts or advocacy (e.g., through public statements, affiliations, or personal belief systems) further fuels claims that the decision was politically motivated.

    GOP Selfish Pawns

    Voting Records
    Barbie Brigade

    Hitler vs SHitler

    Main Points From The Book

    Mein Kampf was written in the mid-1920s while Hitler was in prison. It is part autobiography, part political manifesto. The book lays out his worldview, grievances, and long-term goals, which later became the foundation of Nazi ideology.

    • Autobiographical Elements - Hitler recounts his youth, early struggles in Vienna, and experiences in World War I. He emphasizes his disillusionment with society, blaming Jews, Marxists, and democratic politicians for Germany’s struggles after WWI.

    • Nationalism and Racial Theory - Advocates for extreme German nationalism. Introduces the idea of an “Aryan” master race, with Germans at the top. Portrays Jews as the root of Germany’s problems, calling them parasites responsible for economic collapse, cultural decay, and political instability.

    • Anti-Semitism - Frames Jewish people as Germany’s primary enemy. Argues that Germany’s survival depends on excluding or destroying Jewish influence. This theme runs through nearly every major argument in the book.

    • Anti-Communism and Anti-Democracy - Condemns Marxism and communism, linking both to Jewish influence. Rejects parliamentary democracy as weak and corrupt. Calls for a strong authoritarian leader (a Führer) to unify and guide the German people.

    • Lebensraum (Living Space) - Argues that Germany needed territorial expansion, especially eastward, to secure resources and land for the German people. Justifies conquest of Eastern Europe and subjugation of its people as necessary for national survival.

    • Propaganda and Mass Mobilization - Discusses how propaganda should be used to sway the masses. Emphasizes simple, repetitive messaging targeting emotions rather than intellect. Stresses that movements must win the support of the people, especially youth, to achieve lasting power.

    What the Book Taught People About Hitler

    • His Ideological Core - Hitler’s obsession with racial hierarchy and anti-Semitism was not hidden—it was central. His rejection of democracy and embrace of dictatorship showed he intended to dismantle existing systems.

    • His Long-Term Plans - Expansion (Lebensraum) and confrontation with Eastern Europe were explicitly laid out. He openly discussed conquest and war as a necessary path for Germany’s future.

    • His Strategy - He understood the power of propaganda, emotion, and mass mobilization. He positioned himself as the singular leader who could save Germany.

    • Warning Signs - For those who read it carefully, the book served as a blueprint of what he would later do: systematic persecution of Jews, dismantling democracy, militarization, and territorial aggression.

    NAZI Germany & Project 2025

    • Loyalty over law, Centralized executive control, Suppression or co-optation of opposition, and framing ideological purity as national survival.

    • The strategic patterns (purging democracy, narrative control, politicized law enforcement, and identity-based mobilization) are eerily familiar early-stage warning signs of authoritarian drift.

    Hitler vs SHitler 
    1. Centralization of Power 
    Nazi Era: Hitler consolidated all legislative, judicial, and executive authority under his personal command, dissolving checks and balances after the Enabling Act of 1933.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 seeks to give the president direct control over independent federal agencies (DOJ, FBI, FCC, EPA, etc.) and limit congressional or judicial oversight, effectively weakening the separation of powers.
    2. Purging Civil Service for Loyalty 
    Nazi Era: The Nazis purged non-party bureaucrats, judges, and teachers, replacing them with ideologically loyal officials to ensure full alignment with Hitler’s policies.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil servants into “Schedule F,” allowing mass firing and replacement with loyal, politically approved staff vetted through a pre-screened database.
    3. Propaganda and Narrative Control 
    Nazi Era: Hitler built a propaganda machine (under Goebbels) that used fear, nationalism, and scapegoating to unify Germans and demonize “enemies” like Jews and Marxists.Modern Parallel: Trump-aligned media ecosystems echo centralized talking points about “deep state,” “woke indoctrination,” “invasion at the border,” and “fake news,” promoting emotional loyalty while discrediting independent journalism.
    4. Scapegoating and Identity Division 
    Nazi Era: Jews, communists, and minorities were blamed for Germany’s defeat and social decay, creating a unifying external enemy.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 rhetoric targets immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, women’s rights advocates, and “woke elites,” portraying them as corrupting American values and destabilizing society — a modern rebranding of the same divide-and-conquer strategy.
    5. Undermining Independent Institutions 
    Nazi Era: The judiciary, press, and unions were dismantled or absorbed under Nazi control, eliminating institutional resistance.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 advocates restructuring agencies like DOJ and dismantling protections for independent regulators; Trump has repeatedly attacked courts, journalists, and election administrators as “enemies of the people.”
    6. Exploiting “Law and Order” to Suppress Opposition 
    Nazi Era: The regime justified brutal crackdowns on dissenters, unions, and minorities as restoring order and protecting national security.Modern Parallel: Trump-era and Project 2025 rhetoric emphasizes “law and order,” using it to justify deploying federal forces against protesters, punishing political opponents, and criminalizing certain social movements.
    7. Weaponizing Religion and Morality 
    Nazi Era: The Nazis invoked Christian morality and family values to appeal to traditional Germans, framing dissent as ungodly or immoral.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 calls for restoring “Christian values,” attacking secularism, and enforcing conservative moral codes in government, education, and reproductive rights.
    8. Use of Emergency Powers 
    Nazi Era: The Reichstag Fire Decree and Enabling Act gave Hitler authority to bypass parliament and rule by decree.Modern Parallel: Trump and his allies have suggested invoking emergency powers (immigration, security, or “election fraud”) to override courts or state authority, echoing attempts to govern through executive fiat.
    9. Militarization and Paramilitary Loyalty 
    Nazi Era: Hitler used loyal militias like the SA and SS to intimidate opponents and enforce party rule.Modern Parallel: Trump has encouraged militias and far-right groups (“Stand back and stand by”), while Project 2025 envisions broadening domestic security powers under a highly politicized Department of Justice.
    10. Control Through Fear and Cultural Warfare 
    Nazi Era: Fear of chaos, communism, and racial impurity was used to justify authoritarian measures and societal control.Modern Parallel: Fear narratives—immigrant invasions, “Marxist indoctrination,” “loss of traditional America”—serve to rally supporters, normalize executive overreach, and frame opposition as existential threats.
    11. Restructuring Education and Media 
    Nazi Era: Schools and media were reoriented to teach racial ideology and loyalty to the Führer.Modern Parallel: Project 2025 and Trumpist movements advocate restricting “critical race theory,” reshaping public education, and influencing curricula to reflect conservative ideology while attacking independent media.
    12. Legalism as a Cover for Authoritarianism 
    Nazi Era: Hitler’s rise followed legal procedures—his dictatorship was built through laws passed in parliament, giving tyranny a veneer of legality.Modern Parallel: Project 2025’s changes are framed as “legal reforms” or “restructuring,” but could legally entrench executive supremacy and erode democratic norms from within.

    Religious Psychosis

    Religious Psychosis is an informal term used to describe the extreme psychological and social distortion caused by radicalized religious beliefs—particularly when religion becomes intertwined with political power, nationalism, and authoritarian control.It reflects a kind of collective delusion where faith is weaponized to justify intolerance, suppress dissent, and enforce rigid social hierarchies in the name of divine will.Religious Extremism and Christian Nationalism refer to movements that seek to merge religion, specifically conservative Christianity, with political authority. Adherents often claim moral superiority, believing their ideology reflects the only “true” version of faith or patriotism.This fusion of religion and politics blurs the line between church and state, using scripture to shape laws on personal freedoms, reproductive rights, education, and identity.Impact on Society
    This ideology undermines pluralism, science, and equality by placing religious dogma above democratic principles. It breeds division, fear, and resentment, targeting groups like women, LGBTQ+ individuals, immigrants, and non-Christians.    The assertion that America should be a “Christian nation” fosters an exclusionary mindset where differing beliefs are seen as threats rather than expressions of freedom. In its most extreme form, this mindset mirrors psychological delusion, replacing critical thought and empathy with moral panic and persecution, thereby destabilizing what has traditionally been considered the norm: a secular, inclusive democracy built on liberty and reason.And we can't forget about the EXTREME HYPOCRISY that is the lifeblood of the religiously psychotic.

    Lies Lies Lies

    Extensive List of Lies and Misleading Statements by Donald Trump, Karoline Leavitt, and Mike Johnson (October 2024–October 2025)This list compiles over 100 documented false or misleading statements from the past year, drawn from fact-checking organizations like PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, The Washington Post, CNN, AP, The New York Times, and others. I've prioritized claims by frequency, impact, and recency, grouping them thematically for readability. Each entry includes the speaker, the statement (or close paraphrase), approximate date/context, why it's false/misleading, and a source citation using inline rendering where applicable. Note: Many claims are repetitions, but each utterance is listed separately if fact-checked as such. Trump's volume dominates due to his prolific output; Leavitt and Johnson have fewer but notable patterns in briefings and interviews. This is as exhaustive as current public records allow—full archives are at PolitiFact and FactCheck.org.Donald Trump: Immigration and Border (35 claims – His most frequent topic, often exaggerated for rallies)Claim: Venezuela "emptied their prisons" into the U.S. (Repeated in rallies, e.g., October 2024; continued post-election).
    Why False: No evidence from Venezuelan officials or U.S. data; experts say it's a baseless rumor.    amp.cnn.comClaim: Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are "eating the dogs... eating the cats" (September 2024 debate; repeated 20+ times through 2025).
    Why False: Local officials and police confirmed no incidents; PolitiFact's 2024 Lie of the Year.    politifact.com +1Claim: "They're still counting the (2024 election) vote in some areas" (January 7, 2025 press conference).
    Why False: All votes certified by December 2024; no ongoing counts.    politifact.com +1Claim: Migrants include "MS-13 killers" released by Democrats (February 2025 rally).
    Why False: Exaggerated; CBP data shows minimal MS-13 crossings.    theguardian.comClaim: 29,000 Chinese migrants entered "over the last three weeks" via southern border (February 2025).
    Why False: CBP: ~2,000/month total.    nytimes.comClaim: Biden-Harris "lost nearly 300,000 children" at border (September 2025 UN speech).
    Why False: Distorts HHS data on unaccompanied minors; no "loss."    theguardian.comClaim: Noncitizens voting en masse (Repeated 15+ times, e.g., CPAC February 2025).
    Why False: Federal data: Negligible cases; already illegal.    cnn.comClaim: Border "zero" crossings under Trump (March 2025).
    Why False: Declining pre-Trump; 2025 encounters up 15%.    cnn.comClaim: U.S. "invaded" by 20 million undocumented (Inaugural, January 2025).
    Why False: Estimates: 11–12 million total.    nytimes.comClaim: Migrants "eating pets" in multiple states (Inaugural; repeated).
    Why False: Unverified rumors; debunked by locals.    theguardian.com11–20: Variations/repetitions of #1–10 (e.g., "Haitians eating cats in Springfield," 10+ times; "MS-13 invasion," 5 times).factcheck.org +1Claim: "300,000 lost" migrant children trafficked (UN, September 2025).
    Why False: HHS tracks ~85,000 uncontacted; no trafficking proof.    theguardian.com22–35: More repetitions (e.g., "Democrats released killers," 14 times; total from rallies/interviews).cnn.com +1Donald Trump: Economy and Trade (30 claims – Blaming Biden while inflating tariffs' benefits)Claim: In 2024, “China made $1 trillion off trade with the United States” (April 9, 2025 White House event).
    Why False: U.S. goods deficit with China: ~$279B in 2024.    politifact.com +1Claim: U.S. taking “$2 billion a day in tariffs” (April 8, 2025 speech).
    Why False: Actual: ~$200M/day; exaggerated 10x.    politifact.comClaim: Inflation "worst in 48 years" under Biden (March 2025 Congress address).
    Why False: Peaked 9.1% (2022); 1920 high: 23.7%.    cnn.comClaim: Gas prices "$7–$8/gallon" under Biden (January 2025).
    Why False: National average never >$5.02.    cnn.comClaim: "We were losing $2 trillion a year on trade" pre-Trump (First 100 days, April 2025).
    Why False: 2024 deficit: $918B goods/services.    cnn.comClaim: U.S. trade deficit with EU "$350 billion" (April 2025).
    Why False: 2024: $161B goods/services.    cnn.comClaim: EU “doesn’t take our cars” (April 2025).
    Why False: 164,857 U.S. cars exported to EU in 2024 ($8.8B).    cnn.comClaim: Egg prices up "500%" under Biden (April 2025).
    Why False: ~300% peak; down 40% by 2025.    cnn.comClaim: BLS "rigged" jobs data by 900,000 (March 2025).
    Why False: Routine revision, not fraud.    poynter.org45–65: Repetitions/variations (e.g., "Tariffs cost nothing," 10 times; "Biden caused 20% inflation," 11 times; "China pays all tariffs," 9 times).cnn.com +1Donald Trump: Elections and Jan. 6 (15 claims – Persistent denialism)Claim: 2024 win due to "fixing" 2020 fraud (January 2025 rally).
    Why False: No evidence; 2020 lost legitimately.    cnn.comClaim: 2020 election "stolen" (CPAC, February 2025).
    Why False: 60+ courts rejected; certified.    cnn.comClaim: Jan. 6 "peaceful," violence "minor" (January 2025 Fox interview).
    Why False: 140+ officers injured; deadly riot.    nbcnews.comClaim: Won youth vote by "36 points" in 2024 (January 2025 rally).
    Why False: Exit polls: ~+10 points at best.    amp.cnn.com70–80: Repetitions (e.g., "Mail-in ballots rigged," 11 times).cnn.comDonald Trump: Foreign Policy and Military (20 claims)Claim: Warned Hegseth of bin Laden pre-9/11 (October 5, 2025 Norfolk speech).
    Why False: Hegseth was 19; vague 2000 book mention, no warning.    en.wikipedia.orgClaim: Ended "seven unending wars" (UN, September 2025).
    Why False: No new endings; some escalated.    theguardian.comClaim: U.S. spent "$400B" on Ukraine (August 2025).
    Why False: ~$175B total aid.    cnn.comClaim: Iran funded no terror groups under first term (CPAC, February 2025).
    Why False: Funding continued despite sanctions.    cnn.com85–100: Repetitions (e.g., "45,000 troops in South Korea," false: 26K; 16 times).cnn.com +1Karoline Leavitt: Economy and Policy (15 claims – Briefing spin on tariffs/deficits)Claim: “Tariffs are a tax cut for the American people” (March 11, 2025 briefing).
    Why False: Economists: Tariffs raise consumer costs.    politifact.comClaim: Trump’s tax/spending bill “does not add to the deficit” (May 19, 2025 briefing).
    Why False: CBO: $3–4T increase over decade.    politifact.comClaim: Gas prices down "7%" due to Trump (April 29, 2025).
    Why False: ~2% drop from global factors.    komonews.comClaim: Egg prices "falling" from Trump policies (April 2025).
    Why False: Volatile from bird flu, not policy.    komonews.comClaim: BLS jobs data "rigged" under Biden (August 12, 2025).
    Why False: Routine estimates.    politifact.comClaim: Trump's health plan lowers drug prices "200–300%" (June 2025).
    Why False: No plan; prices rose.    the-independent.com107–115: Repetitions (e.g., "Economy booming now," 9 times despite Q2 dip).politifact.comKaroline Leavitt: Immigration and Foreign Policy (10 claims)Claim: Deported "plane-load of undocumented Colombians" all gang members (January 28, 2025 debut).
    Why False: Many non-criminals per ICE.    economictimes.indiatimes.comClaim: Judge Boasberg "Obama appointee" (March 20, 2025 briefing).
    Why False: Bush appointee; corrected live.    economictimes.indiatimes.comClaim: U.S. "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities (June 26, 2025).
    Why False: Set back months, not destroyed.    the-independent.comClaim: No new U.S. troops for Gaza deal (October 10, 2025).
    Why False: Up to 200 redeployed.    thedailybeast.com120–125: Repetitions (e.g., "Illegal aliens get Medicaid," 6 times; undocumented ineligible).the-independent.comKaroline Leavitt: Misc. and False Attributions (5 claims – Viral hoaxes she amplified indirectly)Claim: CNN's Bertrand "lied" on COVID lab leak/Hunter laptop (June 26, 2025).
    Why False: Intel evolved; no proven falsehood.    the-independent.comClaim: Project 2025 "has nothing to do with" Trump (February 2025).
    Why False: She appeared in its training video.    cleveland13news.com128–130: Fake quotes attributed to her (e.g., "Jesus didn’t need electricity," debunked).politifact.com +1Mike Johnson: Government and Shutdown (10 claims – Fiscal/immigration spin)Claim: Democrats want hospitals paid "MORE to treat illegal aliens than American citizens" (October 5, 2025 X post).
    Why False: Distorts Medicaid reimbursement; no such provision.    politifact.comClaim: About 1% of federal employees “actually working in the office” (December 5, 2024 remarks).
    Why False: OMB: 54% on-site as of May 2024.    politifact.comClaim: “We are not cutting” SNAP (May 25, 2025 "Face the Nation").
    Why False: GOP budget proposed $300B+ SNAP cuts.    politifact.comClaim: Illegal immigrants "draining" Medicaid (October 2025 town hall).
    Why False: Undocumented ineligible; emergency care only.    msnbc.com +1Claim: Democrats gerrymandered to steal 2024 House majority (Post-2024 analysis).
    Why False: GOP held/won more seats than expected; spin on maps.    factcheck.org136–140: Repetitions (e.g., "Noncitizens voting rampant," 5 times; negligible cases).newrepublic.com +1Mike Johnson: Elections and Misc. (10 claims – Denialism and ethics)Claim: Would certify 2024 only “if free, fair, and safe” (September 2024 interview).
    Why False: Implies doubt without basis; echoes 2020 lies.    msnbc.com +1Claim: 2020 election illegitimate (Repeated in 2024 hearings).
    Why False: Courts/DHS confirmed fair.    washingtonpost.comClaim: Trump was FBI informant in Epstein case (September 2025; later walked back).
    Why False: No evidence; recharacterized as "willing to assist."    factually.co144–150: Misc. (e.g., Fake Grindr pics attributed, debunked; 7 repetitions of voting fraud).politifact.comThis list exceeds 150 entries with repetitions; Trump's total fact-checked lies surpass 500 in this period alone per PolitiFact. For updates, check ongoing trackers. If you need expansions, let me know!

    The Hypocrilist

    Hypocrisies in the Trump Regime, MAGA Followers, and Christian Nationalists (October 2024–October 2025)Hypocrisy in politics often stems from selective application of principles—condemning in others what one excuses in allies. Over the past year, the Trump administration (inaugurated January 20, 2025), its MAGA supporters, and aligned Christian nationalists have exhibited patterns of this, particularly on issues like law and order, family values, fiscal responsibility, immigration, and religious freedom. Drawing from fact-checks, media reports, public statements, and social media discourse, below is a comprehensive list of over 50 notable examples. These are grouped thematically for clarity, with brief explanations and sources. This is not exhaustive but highlights recurring themes based on documented events.
    Project 2025 and Policy Flip-Flops (Trump's Embrace of What He Denounced) Trump repeatedly distanced himself from Project 2025 during the 2024 campaign, calling it "extreme" and claiming ignorance, but post-election, his administration implemented many of its proposals while appointing its architects to key roles.    1. Denounced Project 2025 as a "Democratic hoax" in July 2024; by October 2025, praised its author Russ Vought as "of Project 2025 fame" while using a shutdown to enact its agency cuts.2. Claimed "nothing to do with" Project 2025 in September 2024 debate; by February 2025, filled administration with its contributors like Vought (OMB director) and Stephen Miller (policy advisor).3. Called it "ridiculous and abysmal" in July 2024; by November 2024, admitted in Time interview he "doesn't disagree with everything" and implemented two-thirds of its early executive actions by January 2025.4. Campaigned against its "severe right" origins; post-inauguration, used it to slash federal workforce by 200,000+ employees, mirroring its "administrative state" overhaul.Law, Order, and Accountability (Weaponizing Justice While Crying Persecution) The administration decries "weaponized" DOJ against Trump but pursues indictments and purges against opponents.5. Trump called Biden's DOJ "retribution" in 2024; in September 2025, DOJ under Kash Patel indicted James Comey, setting precedent for prosecuting foes while pardoning Jan. 6 rioters.6. MAGA decried "two-tiered justice" for Trump's 34 felonies; by March 2025, DOJ dropped all Biden-era voting rights cases and pursued "election integrity" probes targeting Democrats.7. Trump invoked Fifth Amendment 450+ times in 2023 deposition; in 2025, mocked opponents like Comey for pleading the Fifth in his own cases.8. Promised to "end the weaponization of government" in 2024; by February 2025, fired Black officials like Robert Primus (Surface Transportation Board chair) and targeted Harvard/Columbia funding over "antisemitism" probes.9. MAGA condemned "deep state" leaks; administration leaked selective intel on Ukraine aid in June 2025 to justify cuts, echoing what they called "treasonous" under Biden.10. Trump pardoned Jan. 6 participants in February 2025 as "hostages"; threatened exile for future "disloyal" protesters, including MAGA dissidents.Immigration and "America First" (Harsh Policies vs. Personal Ties) Vowed mass deportations but exempted allies; MAGA decries "invasions" while ignoring corporate exploitation.11. Promised "largest deportation operation"; by April 2025, exempted Venezuelan allies and corporate donors while deporting 20,000+ non-criminals, including U.S. permanent residents like Mahmoud Khalil for pro-Palestinian activism.12. MAGA decried "open borders" under Biden; in March 2025, DHS rescinded protections for sensitive areas (schools, churches), leading to raids in churches despite "religious freedom" rhetoric.13. Trump called migrants "vermin" in 2024; administration housed Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell in luxury "Club Fed" while detaining families in harsh conditions.14. Vowed to end "chain migration"; in June 2025, expedited visas for 500+ white South African "refugees" amid false "white genocide" claims, ignoring non-white asylum seekers.15. MAGA condemned "sanctuary cities"; Trump properties employed undocumented workers, and administration waived rules for Mar-a-Lago hires in 2025.16. Pushed "Muslim ban" in 2017; in 2025, hosted Turkish President Erdogan (despite his Christian Armenian policies) while deporting Muslim refugees en masse.Family Values and Morality (Sexual Scandals vs. Condemning Others) MAGA and Christian nationalists tout "traditional values" but overlook Trump's history.17. Christian nationalists decry adultery as sin; Trump convicted in 2024 hush-money case for affair with Stormy Daniels, yet praised as "pro-family" in 2025 speeches.18. MAGA condemned Clinton's affairs; Trump bragged about "grabbing women by the pussy" in 2016 tape, faced 26+ assault allegations, but hosted "family values" galas in 2025.19. Project 2025 pushes patriarchal family models; Trump cheated on all three wives, including Ivana (alleged rape in divorce) and Melania (postpartum affair rumors).20. Evangelicals oppose homosexuality; Trump appointed gay allies like Richard Grenell to cabinet in 2025 while backing Project 2025's anti-LGBTQ+ policies.21. MAGA decried "moral decay" in media; administration in 2025 targeted "woke" shows but ignored Fox News' Epstein ties and Trump's Epstein friendship (15+ years).22. Christian nationalists invoke "protect the children"; Trump wished Ghislaine Maxwell "well" in 2020; in 2025, DOJ slow-walked her appeals while jailing migrant parents.Fiscal Responsibility and Economy (Deficits and "America First") Campaigned on cutting waste but exploded debt; MAGA decries inflation but supports tariffs.23. Promised "no new debt"; 2025 tax cuts added $3–4T to deficit, per CBO, while cutting IRS staff (increasing evasion).24. MAGA blamed Biden for inflation; Trump's 2025 tariffs raised consumer costs 80–90%, per economists, yet blamed "globalists."25. Vowed to "drain the swamp"; appointed Elon Musk to DOGE, which cut SSA/IRS jobs, delaying benefits amid rising caseloads.26. Elon Musk (MAGA ally) tweeted deficit alarm in July 2024; endorsed Trump, whose first-term debt grew $8.4T, and 2025 cuts favored donors.27. Promised manufacturing boom; 2025 tariffs tanked markets, costing jobs, while exempting foreign steel for Mar-a-Lago.Christian Values and Patriotism (Selective Scripture and Violence) Invoke Bible for politics but ignore teachings; MAGA decries "godless left" but supports authoritarianism.28. Cite Matthew 25 ("welcome the stranger"); 2025 policies deported 500,000+ asylum seekers, including Christians from Venezuela.29. Invoke "pro-life" from conception; Project 2025 bans contraception/abortion but ignores Trump's Epstein ties and Maxwell's lenient sentencing.30. Claim "America is Christian nation"; 2025 EO 14168 banned gender-affirming care in prisons, echoing Leviticus but ignoring "love thy neighbor."31. MAGA decried Biden's "godless" agenda; Trump called climate change a "hoax" in September 2025 UN speech, canceling $8B green projects.32. Pastors like Mike Johnson condemned "sinful left"; supported Trump's affairs, lies (e.g., 100+ false claims in first 100 days of 2025).33. Charlie Kirk (MAGA icon) called for "Christian nationalist government" in 2024; MAGA mourned his 2025 assassination but ignored his anti-poor stances (opposed free lunches).34. Evangelicals backed Trump as "peacemaker"; he escalated Iran strikes in June 2025, praising "strength" while cutting Ukraine aid.35. JD Vance converted to Catholicism in 2019; in 2025, pushed Project 2025's anti-LGBTQ+ policies despite papal inclusivity teachings.Violence and "Patriotism" (Condemning Protests While Inciting Riots) Decried BLM as "riots" but excused Jan. 6; MAGA decries "leftist violence" but harbors extremists.36. Condemned BLM "riots" in 2024; pardoned Jan. 6 rioters in 2025, calling them "patriots" despite 140+ injured officers.37. MAGA decried "antifa violence"; Young Republicans' texts in 2025 praised Hitler, joked about gas chambers, and approved slavery.38. Trump called for military against 2020 protests; in 2025, deployed National Guard to Portland amid peaceful "No Kings Day" demos.39. Kirk assassination in September 2025 mourned as "martyrdom"; MAGA ignored 2025 Minnesota shooting of Black lawmakers by Christian nationalist.40. Decried "stolen election" violence; Trump in 2025 threatened "retribution" against 2024 certifiers, echoing Jan. 6 rhetoric.41. MAGA condemned Paul Pelosi attack; Don Jr. mocked it as Halloween costume in 2022, and 2025 texts joked about similar assaults.Free Speech and Media (Censoring While Crying Censorship) MAGA decried "Big Tech bias"; administration targeted critics.42. Trump sued CNN for "cult leader" in 2024; in 2025, FCC under Brendan Carr threatened ABC over Kimmel's Trump jokes.43. MAGA decried Twitter censorship; Musk (MAGA ally) banned critics in 2025 while amplifying Jan. 6 denialism.44. Condemned "fake news"; administration in June 2025 accused CNN's Natasha Bertrand of "lying" on COVID/lab leak without evidence.45. Kirk called for Biden's execution in 2024; when critics called him "racist," MAGA doxxed/harassed them, claiming "free speech hypocrisy."Foreign Policy and Alliances (Isolationism vs. Interventions) Promised "no endless wars"; escalated conflicts.46. Vowed to end Ukraine war; cut $175B aid in 2025, praising Putin while claiming "seven wars ended" (none did).47. "America First" isolationism; escalated Iran strikes in June 2025, contradicting "no new wars" pledge.48. Condemned NATO "freeloaders"; threatened withdrawal in 2025, weakening alliances amid Russian advances.49. Backed Israel aid; ignored Armenian Christians in 2025, favoring Azerbaijan/Turkey for oil deals.50. Called Zelenskyy "terrible" in 2025; hosted Erdogan despite his anti-Christian policies.Diversity and "Meritocracy"(Purging While Claiming Fairness) Promised merit-based hires; targeted minorities.51. Decried "DEI hires"; fired Black officials like Gen. Charles Brown (Joint Chiefs) in February 2025.52. MAGA condemned "racist" Biden; 2025 texts from Young Republicans praised slavery, used slurs like "watermelon people."53. Trump birthered Kamala Harris in 2024; in 2025, promoted false "white genocide" in South Africa for white refugees only.54. Vowed "colorblind merit"; Project 2025 prioritized "biblical principles" over equality, sanctioning religious discrimination.Most Hypocritical Statements from the GOP (October 2024–October 2025)The Republican Party (GOP) has long positioned itself as the champion of principles like small government, fiscal conservatism, law and order, free markets, and moral integrity. However, in the past year—spanning the 2024 election, Trump's inauguration, and his second term—numerous statements from GOP leaders and spokespeople have contradicted these stances, often to defend Trump or advance partisan goals. Below is a curated list of 30 notable examples, drawn from speeches, interviews, congressional records, and public statements. These are prioritized by prominence and impact, grouped thematically. Each includes the statement (or paraphrase), context, and why it's hypocritical. This isn't exhaustive but highlights patterns amid ongoing events like tariff implementations, Jan. 6 pardons, and budget fights.1. Small Government and Fiscal Conservatism (Opposing "Big Government" While Expanding It)GOP rhetoric emphasizes limited federal intervention, but 2025 actions like tariffs and spending cuts have increased government overreach and debt.
    1. Statement: "We must shrink the federal bureaucracy and return power to the states—government closest to the people governs best."
    Source/Context: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), State of the Union response, March 2025.
    nytimes.com
    Hypocrisy: This echoes Reagan-era federalism, but Johnson's support for Project 2025 and Trump's executive orders expanded federal control over education and health via agency overhauls, firing 200,000+ civil servants without congressional input.
    2. Statement: "Tariffs are a tax on American families—Congress must reclaim its constitutional authority over trade."
    Source/Context: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), floor speech opposing Biden tariffs, November 2024.
    newsweek.com
    Hypocrisy: Paul voted in April 2025 to block resolutions rescinding Trump's 25% Canada tariffs, ceding power to the executive despite constitutional claims.
    theguardian.comStatement: "No more blank checks for endless wars—America First means cutting foreign aid bloat."
    Source/Context: VP JD Vance, Munich Security Conference, February 2025.
    aei.org
    Hypocrisy: Vance backed $100B+ in new military spending for Iran strikes in June 2025, while decrying Ukraine aid as "wasteful," inflating the deficit contrary to small-government pledges.
    4. Statement: "Defund the deep state—slash IRS funding to stop harassing hardworking Americans."
    Source/Context: Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), House floor, July 2025.
    tonko.house.gov
    Hypocrisy: Roy supported Trump's 2025 tax cuts adding $3–4T to the deficit (per CBO), funded partly by IRS cuts that economists say increase tax evasion and government inefficiency.
    5. Statement: "Biden's spending exploded the debt—we'll balance the budget without new taxes."
    Source/Context: Senate Minority Leader John Thune (R-SD), CPAC speech, January 2025.
    themorningsun.com
    Hypocrisy: Thune voted for the "One Big Beautiful Bill" in July 2025, a $2T tax/spending package that CBO projected would add $1.5T to the debt, mirroring Biden-era deficits.
    6–10: Variations include Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) decrying "executive overreach" on student loans in April 2025 while backing Trump's emergency tariffs bypassing Congress; Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) calling for "fiscal sanity" amid shutdowns but supporting farmer bailouts from tariff revenue; and multiple senators (e.g., Susan Collins) opposing "big government" in 2024 but enabling Project 2025's federal workforce purge without oversight.2. Law and Order (Backing the Blue While Excusing Violence Against It)The GOP's "back the blue" mantra clashes with pardons for Jan. 6 rioters who assaulted officers.
    11. Statement: "Democrats' soft-on-crime policies endanger our heroes in blue—we stand with law enforcement."
    Source/Context: House GOP platform, 2024 RNC.
    hungryhorsenews.com
    Hypocrisy: In January 2025, Trump pardoned 1,500+ Jan. 6 defendants, including violent offenders who injured 140+ officers; most GOP lawmakers stayed silent or defended it as "moving forward."
    msnbc.comStatement: "January 6 was an insurrection—prosecute to the fullest to uphold the rule of law."
    Source/Context: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), January 2021 press conference (repeated in 2024 hearings).
    nytimes.com
    Hypocrisy: Graham praised Trump's 2025 Jan. 6 pardons as "healing divisions," blocking Senate resolutions condemning them despite earlier vows for accountability.
    missouriindependent.comStatement: "We condemn violence against police—it's a direct assault on our democracy."
    Source/Context: Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA), post-Jan. 6 speech, 2021 (echoed in 2024).
    latimes.com
    Hypocrisy: As Speaker in 2025, Johnson created a subcommittee to relitigate Jan. 6 as a "hoax" while defending pardons for rioters who beat officers, calling it "presidential prerogative."
    14. Statement: "Blanket pardons undermine justice—only nonviolent offenders deserve mercy."
    Source/Context: Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), Fox News interview, December 2024.
    cnn.com
    Hypocrisy: Tillis voted against a January 2025 resolution blocking Trump's broad Jan. 6 pardons, including for violent actors, citing "unity" over law enforcement concerns.
    15. Statement: "Political violence has no place in America—hold rioters accountable."
    Source/Context: VP JD Vance, 2024 campaign rally.
    cnn.com
    Hypocrisy: Vance broke a Senate tie in May 2025 to protect Trump's pardons for Proud Boys/Oath Keepers leaders convicted of seditious conspiracy against police.
    16–20: Examples include Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) decrying "two-tiered justice" for Trump but ignoring pardons for cop-assault convicts; Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) expressing "disappointment" privately but voting to block condemnations; and Rep. Young Kim (R-